Heating a home efficiently is a key concern for homeowners, particularly in the UK where cold weather can persist for much of the year. Traditional radiators have long been the standard method of heating in British homes, but underfloor heating is becoming an increasingly popular alternative. This article explores the energy efficiency of underfloor heating compared to radiators, examining factors such as running costs, heat distribution, energy consumption, and environmental impact.
Understanding Underfloor Heating
Underfloor heating (UFH) operates by radiating heat from the floor upwards, creating a more uniform and comfortable temperature throughout a room. It comes in two main types:
- Electric Underfloor Heating (Dry System) – Uses electric cables or heating mats installed beneath the floor surface to generate heat.
- Water-Based Underfloor Heating (Wet System) – Involves a network of pipes through which warm water is circulated, usually connected to a boiler or heat pump.
Both systems provide consistent, evenly distributed heat, reducing cold spots and minimising heat loss.
Understanding Radiators
Radiators, by contrast, work by convection, heating the air around them and allowing warm air to circulate throughout a room. While radiators can provide effective heating, they often result in temperature variations, with the air near the ceiling being warmer than the air at floor level. Traditional radiators also tend to heat up quickly but cool down just as fast when turned off.
Energy Efficiency Comparison
1. Heat Distribution and Comfort
Underfloor heating provides a more even distribution of heat. As the warmth rises from the ground, it eliminates cold zones and ensures a consistent temperature across the room. Radiators, however, tend to create uneven heating, with the air near the unit being the warmest while colder pockets can form elsewhere.
The efficiency of underfloor heating in distributing heat means that it can operate at a lower temperature (typically between 27°C and 35°C) while still achieving the same level of comfort. Radiators, on the other hand, often require water temperatures of 60°C to 75°C to heat a room effectively.
2. Energy Consumption and Running Costs
Because underfloor heating operates at a lower temperature, it is generally more energy-efficient than radiators. A wet underfloor heating system connected to a modern condensing boiler or a heat pump can be up to 25% more efficient than traditional radiators. If paired with a renewable energy source such as a heat pump, UFH can significantly reduce overall energy consumption.
Electric underfloor heating is less efficient in terms of energy usage and running costs. Electricity tends to be more expensive than gas, meaning that a dry UFH system is generally costlier to run compared to a wet system or radiators. However, for smaller areas or well-insulated homes, electric underfloor heating can still be a viable and efficient option.
3. Heat Retention and Thermal Mass
Underfloor heating benefits from high thermal mass, meaning it retains heat for longer periods once the system is turned off. This characteristic reduces the need for frequent reheating, which can lower overall energy use. Radiators, by contrast, heat up quickly but also lose heat rapidly once switched off, often leading to greater fluctuations in temperature and energy consumption.
4. Installation and Upfront Costs
One of the biggest barriers to underfloor heating adoption is the initial installation cost. Retrofitting UFH into an existing property can be expensive and disruptive, often requiring floors to be lifted and insulation added. In new builds, however, installation is much simpler and more cost-effective.
Radiators, being the traditional choice, are cheaper and easier to install, particularly in existing homes. However, they may require regular maintenance and upgrades over time to maintain efficiency, such as balancing and bleeding to ensure proper function.
5. Environmental Impact
Underfloor heating, particularly when used with renewable energy sources, has a lower carbon footprint compared to radiators. Because UFH operates at a lower temperature, it requires less energy to maintain a comfortable room temperature, reducing overall energy demand and carbon emissions.
Radiators, particularly those powered by gas boilers, are less environmentally friendly. Although modern, high-efficiency radiators can improve performance, they still rely on higher water temperatures, leading to greater energy consumption and environmental impact.
When is Underfloor Heating the Better Choice?
Underfloor heating is generally the more energy-efficient option in certain scenarios, such as:
- New Builds and Major Renovations: It is easier to install UFH in homes that are being built from scratch or undergoing significant refurbishment.
- Homes with Good Insulation: Proper insulation enhances UFH efficiency, ensuring heat retention and lower energy consumption.
- Larger Open Spaces: UFH works particularly well in larger areas where consistent heating is required.
- Low-Temperature Heating Systems: If using a heat pump or solar thermal system, UFH is highly compatible and efficient.
When are Radiators the Better Choice?
Radiators may still be the preferred option in some circumstances, such as:
- Older Properties: Retrofitting UFH in older homes can be costly and disruptive, making radiators a more practical choice.
- Homes with Poor Insulation: Radiators may be more effective in properties that struggle with heat retention.
- Smaller Spaces: For small rooms or apartments, the cost and complexity of installing UFH may not be justified.
- Short-Term Heating Needs: Radiators heat up quickly, making them useful for homes that only need heating for short bursts rather than all-day warmth.
Related Questions
How many radiators is underfloor heating equivalent to?
Underfloor heating can replace multiple radiators since it distributes heat evenly across a larger surface area. Typically, a well-designed underfloor heating system can provide the same warmth as several radiators, depending on factors like room size, insulation, and system type (electric or water-based).
Is it cheaper to run radiators or underfloor heating?
Underfloor heating is generally more energy-efficient and cheaper to run than traditional radiators because it operates at lower temperatures while providing consistent warmth. However, the installation cost can be higher, especially for retrofitting, but long-term savings on energy bills can make it a cost-effective choice.
Can you replace radiators with underfloor heating?
Yes, you can replace radiators with underfloor heating, but the process depends on factors like floor type, insulation, and whether you choose electric or water-based heating. Retrofitting can be more complex and costly than installing it in a new build, but it offers better heat distribution and energy efficiency in the long run.
Conclusion
When comparing the energy efficiency of underfloor heating and radiators, UFH generally comes out as the superior option, particularly when using a water-based system in a well-insulated home. Its ability to operate at lower temperatures while providing consistent warmth makes it an energy-efficient and comfortable choice for modern households. However, the high initial installation costs and potential challenges with retrofitting mean that radiators still have their place, particularly in older homes.
Ultimately, the best choice depends on the specific needs of a home, its insulation levels, and long-term energy-saving goals. If energy efficiency and lower running costs are a priority, underfloor heating is the way forward, especially when paired with renewable energy sources. However, for those looking for a more straightforward, cost-effective heating solution, radiators remain a reliable and practical option.
Got a few more questions about underfloor heating? Our underfloor heating experts are ready to answer you!